less than 1 minute read

写这篇主要是因为我看到有些 measure 的定义用到了 $\delta$-ring.

Ring of Sets

Ring 的定义可以参考 Elementary Algebraic Structures

非常遗憾的是,ring of sets 其实并不严格满足 ring 的定义 (:angry:)。按 Ring of Sets vs Ring in Universal Algebra 的讨论:

A “ring of sets” should really be called a “distributive lattice of sets.”

Definition: In measure theory, a nonempty family of sets $\mathcal{R}$ is called a ring (of sets) if it is closed under $\cup$ and $-$. That is, $\forall$ set $A,B \in R$,

  1. $A \cup B \in \mathcal{R}$
  2. $A - B \in \mathcal{R}$

Ring of sets / $\sigma$-ring / $\delta$-ring

但是蛋疼的是,后续的 $\sigma$-ring 和 $\delta$-ring 都是在这个不严格的定义上引申出来的:

Definition: A $\sigma$-ring is a ring of sets which is closed under countable unions, i.e.

\[\text{If } A_1, A_2, \ldots \in \mathcal R \Rightarrow \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n \in \mathcal R\]

Definition: A $\delta$-ring is a ring of sets which is closed under countable intersections, i.e.

\[\text{If } A_1, A_2, \ldots \in \mathcal R \Rightarrow \bigcap_{n=1}^\infty A_n \in \mathcal R\]

Categories:

Updated:

Comments